🎯 AI Video: Hype vs. Reality

Jonathan Glazier explores the truth behind generated AI videos. The picture ID of a human head disintegrating in a stream of pixels. It is AI-generated


AI Video: Hype vs. Reality

There’s a lot of noise around AI — some of it exciting, some of it terrifying.

It’s either the robot apocalypse or the dawn of creative freedom, depending on which post you read. But when it comes to AI-generated video content, the conversation often leaps ahead of the tech.

So let’s bring it back to earth.


What Can AI Video Really Do Right Now?

If you’ve seen the headlines, you might think we’re just months away from typing a script and watching a fully formed movie pop out the other side.

The truth?

AI video is powerful — but it’s also unpredictable, glitchy, and very hands-on. You’re not directing a scene; you’re coaxing a sequence.

And that changes everything.


Where AI Video Shines

Right now, the best use cases are:

  • Music videos
  • Adverts
  • Mood reels and trailers
  • Stylised or surreal storytelling
  • B-roll and inserts

Why? Because these formats don’t rely on character consistency, long-form dialogue, or tight shot continuity. You’re telling stories in moments — not full scenes.

Think of it as MTV in the 90s meets Blade Runner dream sequence.

As way of an illustration my very talented contact **Simona Lianza who can be found on linkedin, sent me the video below. It’s a great example of what can be done. A speculative advert done as a showcase. She used ComfyUI to generate the video. She talks of takes for the interations which had all the issues of the 7 fingered monsters. As you can see from the video, it works great as single scenes or shots, perfect for an advert.**

YouTube player

Simona is from Italy, she and I are on exactly the same page.

Yes — AI will lead to job losses. But it will also create entirely new roles and industries. The real challenge isn’t stopping the change — it’s staying ahead of it.

This isn’t a moral debate. It’s a survival issue.

Clinging to the past or trying to ban AI is a losing strategy. Just ask the film editors who refused to adopt Avid in 1989. By 1991, many were out of work.

I make no apologies for saying this clearly: people need to wake up.

This isn’t just about copyright or how the models were trained.

This is about what happens next.

If you work in media, tech, education, or the creative industries — getting ahead of AI isn’t optional. It’s vital. Simona has done just that and I recommend her to anyone wanting to explore the fantastic opportunities AI gives brands to engage with viewers.


Consistency? Still a Work in Progress

You can create beautiful stills with tools like ComfyUI, and you can start to lock in character looks using embeddings, LoRAs, and reference image workflows.

But once you move into motion? Expect your characters to:

  • Morph faces
  • Lose costumes
  • Drift from realism into visual jazz

This is why AI isn’t yet reliable for long-form narrative or anything that needs traditional continuity. You can suggest direction — but you can’t direct. Not yet.

Here is a video i stoyborded in Sora. It was meant to be the journey of a director from a studio to an OB control room during the Sound Check. It was a set from a singer like Dua Lipa. So in ,y prompt I mentioed dancers, without blowing my own trumpet, I have been writing propmu for quite some time. These were the result of my forst iteration. You can see the issues…

YouTube player

YouTube player

Landmarks? Iconic, but Not Accurate

Need a drone shot of the Marina Bay Sands hotel in Singapore?

The AI might give you two towers instead of three. It’s close, but not quite. And that’s part of a wider issue: AI models avoid replicating copyrighted landmarks, and when they try, they approximate — sometimes brilliantly, sometimes hilariously.

The workaround? Start with real plates and enhance with AI. Or use reference-controlled workflows to nudge the model in the right direction.

This was also generated using Sora — an early test for a sizzle reel we’re building for a pitch in Singapore.

Most of us know the Marina Bay Sands Hotel, right?

Take a look at the video… and spot the problem.

This is what the first wave of AI video looks like.

It’s impressive — but it’s also unreliable. The detail isn’t there yet. The control? Limited.

And that’s the point.

YouTube player

So What’s the Reality?

Here’s where we are right now:

  • You can build a cast of characters.
  • You can design stylised worlds and dreamlike sequences.
  • You can generate high-quality mood visuals and short form content.
  • But you can’t yet direct a 90-minute feature with full scene control, emotional nuance, and shot-by-shot continuity.

That doesn’t mean we’re far off. The pace of change is wild. We will get to script-to-screen workflows — but today’s tools require human vision, selection, and editing.

It’s more impressionist painting than cinema.


The Takeaway

If you’re in media, this isn’t a threat — it’s a new layer.

AI isn’t replacing directors, editors, or creatives. It’s giving them weird, powerful new tools to experiment with. Tools that work best when you understand their limits.

For now, it’s about exploring the edges. Not automating the centre.


Thanks for reading — and for doing the work.

Keep making things that matter.

Jonathan

Media Consultant & Format Creator

Trusted by 10,000+ media professionals, freelancers, and creatives.

altmedia by Jonathan Glazier

Want to get this in your inbox via Substack?

Or follow me on LinkedIn

AI or rather ChatGPT made me laugh

AI made me Laugh

This week, AI or rather ChatGPT made me laugh. And that, in itself, is a bit of a worry.

I was writing a satirical post for social media—yes, I do try to be funny (stop rolling your eyes). It was full of irony and sharp observations—the kind of inside-media commentary only this audience truly gets.

Because of my dyslexia, I run everything through ChatGPT for grammar, structure, and spelling. I’ll often ask for SEO suggestions too—no point shouting into the void.

The piece was more or less done. I just wanted a final polish. One line read:

“Ensure the cast includes every underrepresented group, without implying tokenism.”

ChatGPT’s suggestion?

“Think BAFTA meets genuine.”

I burst out laughing. Then I paused.

Because that’s a good line. A funny line. A knowing line.

And I didn’t write it.


So let’s unpack that, AI or rather ChatGPT made me laugh

Here’s what’s fascinating—and yes, slightly terrifying.

I never mentioned BAFTA. The AI made the connection between diverse casting and the award circuit. It understood the link:

Include every underrepresented group → awards recognition → hello BAFTA.

That’s not just wordplay. That’s insight.

It likely scanned hundreds—maybe thousands—of articles where BAFTA is discussed in the context of representation. It delivered a line that’s sharp, ironic, and just self-aware enough to land with a media crowd.

Too good? Maybe. Which raises the bigger question:

Is this original? Or just well-scraped human genius?


And then it hit me again…

Here’s another gem ChatGPT threw in:

Include at least three fake focus group quotes (use “Millennial Mum, Bristol” or “Gen Z, Glasgow” liberally).

I hadn’t mentioned focus groups. But the AI inferred the pain behind pitching. It knows that many creative decisions are filtered through the dreaded research panel. And then it gave me two characters so perfectly pitched, they practically walk onto screen themselves.

That kind of observational detail—that’s comedy room level.

It reminded me of something Bob Mortimer once said in an interview. He was talking about fish.

“Cod? Not funny. Plaice? Even less funny. But haddock—that’s a funny fish.”

It’s absurd. But he’s right. That instinct for specificity?

That’s what makes us human. Or so we thought.

Because now, thanks to AI’s training on everything from scripts to podcast transcripts, anyone who knows what to ask can get the same material.


Here’s the dilemma

When I heard Bob tell that story, I learned something. I could borrow the technique. Be inspired. Make it my own.

Is that really so different from what AI is doing?

Aren’t we all just standing on the shoulders of giants—whether that giant is Bob in a podcast or GPT on a laptop?

This is why creatives are anxious.

Why copyright and authorship are suddenly up for debate.

And why plagiarism is starting to look a lot more complicated.

So I ran an experiment…

What if I didn’t just refine my writing with AI?

What if I gave it the whole brief?

“Write a satirical social media post about pitching new shows that includes irony, insider references, and commentary on tokenism in casting.”

Then I pushed further.

“You are an AI tasked with writing a pitch for a new, original Channel 4 programme format.”

“Please model the commissioning editor as follows:” (traits please)

“Now, build the pitch under the following parameters:” (parameters please)

This was aimed squarely at those of us who’ve spent far too many hours hovering near the lifts at Horseferry Road.

Here’s what came back:

Traits of a Channel 4 Commissioning Editor

(Unofficial, but Painfully Accurate)

  1. Desperate for Innovation… But Only If It’s Been Done Before
  2. Says “Bold” and “Disruptive” A Lot
  3. Loves the Underdog
  4. Asks “Can We Shoot It in Leeds?”
  5. Too Busy to Read This

Pitch Parameters

(As Interpreted by a Cynical Industry Veteran)

  • Title – Must sound AI-generated but slightly brilliant.
  • Tagline – One line that screams “impact” but is basically chaos.
  • Format Summary – Think Bake Off meets Black Mirror meets an emotional breakdown on Gogglebox.
  • USP – Weird enough to win a BAFTA.
  • Casting Brief – A neurodivergent poet, an ex-reality star, and someone from a kombucha commune.
  • Delivery Format – 6 x 60 for linear, 200 verticals for Snap, and a podcast because synergy.
  • Social Purpose – Tackles a social issue… but not enough to make people turn off before the ad break.
  • Risk Level – Shocks the Daily Mail just enough.

And here’s what AI pitched…

1. Bake It Till You Fake It

Tagline: It’s not about the cake. It’s about the trauma.

Synopsis:

Six people who can’t bake for toffee enter a tent (not that tent, obviously) and blag their way through Pinterest-level challenges using shop-bought cake, a glue gun, and lies.

Judged by a real baker and a budget celeb with no taste buds.

Expect tears, sugar crashes, and someone sobbing into a Swiss roll.

It’s The Traitors, but stickier.


2. Britain’s Most Passive-Aggressive Town

Tagline: One town. Zero chill.

Synopsis:

Neighbours face off over bins, hedges, and unspoken parking codes using only passive-aggressive tactics.

Narrated by Olivia Colman. Or someone Olivia Colman-adjacent.

Finale? A tea party where everyone pretends they’re fine.

It’s Come Dine With Me meets Succession—with conifers.


3. Naked and Afraid: Wedding Edition

Tagline: One couple. No clothes. No guests. No idea.

Synopsis:

Two strangers are matched by algorithm and meet—naked—on a clifftop to get married.

No celebrant. No phone signal. No clue who brought the rings.

They must build their outfits from moss. There’s a therapist. In a tent.

Execs will say it’s “a radical exploration of modern intimacy.”

We know it’s for the memes.


So… AI can write telly.

or can it?

It seems it can do satire.

And it can get dangerously close to a real Channel 4 greenlight. Humm if only

But should it?

And That’s the question.

Until next time—

Jonathan

Glazier Media Ltd.

Smarter Storytelling. Better Production. Across Every Platform.


Oh and for comparison, sorry if you already saw it, this is my version

Channel 4 – AI Pitch Prompt

The Next Big Thing on channel 4

I am writing a channel four pitch with the help of an AI Pitch Prompt, and i thought I’d share my generic prompt as a public service.


🧠 AI PROMPT: Write a Channel 4 Programme Pitch

You are an AI tasked with writing a pitch for a new, original Channel 4 programme format.

Please model the commissioning editor as follows:

Has no imagination. Describe the show as if speaking to a Year 2 student who is still using fat crayons and believes glitter is a legitimate narrative device.

Has just read the Guardian Media section over a matcha latte and a gluten-free vegan sausage roll in an East London café with no chairs and a shared sense of irony.

Saw a lone magpie on their cycle commute and now won’t take any creative risks until Q3 next year. Possibly Q4.

Avoid all phrases suggesting risk or innovation: e.g. “run with this,” “out of the box,” “fresh new voice,” or “what if we just…”

Now, build the pitch under the following parameters:

Mention HETV no fewer than seven times. Add it to the title if needed.

Add a zero to every budget line. Then add another for development (to solidify the HETV credential.)

Ensure the cast includes every underrepresented group, without implying tokenism. Think BAFTA meets genuine.

Drop in our Albert Certification and our biofuel-powered generators, obviously.

Wardrobe will be 100% natural fibres, all sourced from Vinted. Max spend per item: £4.50.

Catering is organic, vegan, and seasonal, supplied by a Hackney-based foraging co-op with a TikTok following.

Include at least three fake focus group quotes (use “Millennial Mum, Bristol” or “Gen Z, Glasgow” liberally).

End the pitch with the line:
“This could have been a podcast, but we made it television to save the planet.”

End of prompt.

(Unless AI has any final notes. In which case, they should be passive aggressive and include a footnote referencing Fleabag.)


👋 Fellow pitchers, feel free to steal, adapt, or add to this. Just don’t forget to remove all references to joy, chaos, or risk before submission.

#TVIndustry hashtag#Channel4 hashtag#Pitching hashtag#SatireButNotReally hashtag#HETV hashtag#AlbertCertified hashtag#LinkedInHumour hashtag#MediaLife


Let me know if you want a graphic or image to go with it! B@@@@s to Copyright long live AI